Usually, large machine parts and other components of iron, bronze, brass and aluminum are produced through sand casting process. Natural or synthetic sand is used to make moulds from sand casting process. Casting is done by pouring molten metal into the mould cavity, which is designed out of sand. Sand casting components come with surface impurities and surface variations and a rough surface.

The die used for die casting is usually made of a high-strength metal or graphite material. These dies are very expensive to produce. Die casting process is most suited to repetitive and high-value casting components. Sand casting is the most common technique and very popular among the casting manufacturers around the world. The process combines good casting quality with flexibility in metal type and casting size. Sand casting process is most suited to foundries, which produce a wide variety of large casting products. Permanent patterns, used in this process, are typically made of wood and less expensive than die moulds. Molten metal is poured into the mould that collapses automatically once the solidification of metal.
The purpose of developing shell casting process was to achieve high levels of throughput for repetitive casting operations. One of the advantages of shell casting is that it greatly reduces the sand:metal. At the same time the dimensional accuracy of the castings is typically higher than for sand moulding. It minimizes the work involved in cleaning and machining the product.
Temporary patterns are made from wax or foam In investment casting and lost foam casting. These patterns are generally made manually using traditional carving tools and carved mechanically using automated tooling.
These processes cost more and can't be applied to all type of casting size, but it can achieve the highest casting quality. In case of complex parts where machining is almost impossible, investment casting can be very cost effective. High dimensional accuracy can also be achieved by Lost foam casting process. It also has many environmental and operational benefits over traditional sand casting process.
You can't define a casting process as 'the best' as it completely depends on the specific need of the application. Hence, you should be careful while selecting the most appropriate technique or techniques that suit the type of castings produced and the operational constraints. We have discussed the major casting methods and their more common variants in the following sections.
| Sand Casting | Die Casting | Sand Shell | Investment Casting | |
| Tool costs | Low | High | Average | Average |
| Unit costs | Average | Low | Average | High |
| Maximum casting weight | Over 1 tonne | 30 Kg | 100 Kg | 45 Kg |
| Thinnest section castable(mm) | 2.5 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Typical dimensional tolerance(mm) | 0.3 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Relative surface finish | Fair to good | Best | Good | Very good |
| Relative mechanical properties | Good | Very good | Good | Fair |
| Relative ease of casting complex design | Fair to good | Good | Good | Best |
| Relative ease of changing design in production | Best | Poorest | Fair | Fair |
| Metal options | Best | Poorest | Fair | Fair |
| Comparison of Several Casting Methods | ||||



